Because they know better than anyone else, right? They have no direct quotes. They have the name of an op that does not have a direct connection to either of the viruses. They have nothing that would stand up to examination and be considered proof. But who needs proof when your the Times. They don't report the news, they create the news.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Man the times laid out pretty well where and who wrote it, even had the op > names and stuff. They had some people inside the op and everything. > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Michael Dinowitz < > mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > > > > Well, the only company to really detect and investigate the virus(s) has > > been a Russian one... > > > > But as par for the course in the middle east, if its bad for the Arabs, > it > > has to be Israel's fault. Proof? Who needs proof. We've seen it before > and > > we'll see it again. And when it turns out to be someone other than > Israel, > > no one will care about the accusations. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:352331 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
