On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You call for facts, but all I see in your messages is confirmation bias. > How so? I believe that the US and/or Israel was behind Stuxnet. I've said so numerous times. I'm calling into question the book/reporter/source/whatever that claims that my belief is fact. I want corroboration. I want to see some facts. That's all. The best way to argue this with me is to show some source that shows the US/Israel was behind the virus without referring to the book as evidence. I've read lots of articles where its implied. Where a wink or interpreted sentence is taken as 'close enough to fact'. I'm tired of those. Would you be so quick to reject this out of hand if the claim was that > Iran was behind a cyber attack on Israel? > If it was stated in a news article without any confirmation, the answer is yes. I've seen the news used as a weapon and soap box more often than I'd like. I've seen lies by omission and commission. I've seen selective quoting, misrepresentation, and reinterpreting of facts/events. If anyone is reporting something, especially something big/important, then I want to see some facts. I want truth. When we've heard in the past that Microsoft was buying CF or Adobe was dropping it, did we believe or do we check? > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Michael Dinowitz > <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > Show me the sources of the quotes, especially when it comes to the claim > > that America was behind Stuxnet. Isn't there transcripts of these > meetings? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:352408 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
