[Note: I changed the subject] Some questions for you, Jerry.
Why do you think the DOJ prosecutor in Arizona told the ATF agents not to arrest the gun buyers? Do you think he was acting on orders from Eric Holder, or possibly even Obama? Or is it possible that he was trying to follow the letter of the law and not make an arrest until he had enough evidence. Or maybe he had some other motive, like being in bed with the cartels? Why do you think the investigation has not asked that question of the prosecutor, and what do you think his answer would be if they did? What is your main complaint against the DOJ and the ATF in this case? That they may have acted in such a way as to cause the death of a border patrol agent, or that they are part of a Democratic administration, or do you have some other beef? On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote: > This shouldn't be a normal occurrence, but with the current DOJ's track > record, one needs to by wary and suspicious. > > > "Oversight is a good thing. I'm in favor of it." > > Of course it is. The problem is "What do you think oversight is?" Is it > oversight investigating Democrats or is harassment? I have my opinion of > what you believe, but I'll keep it to myself. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:352642 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
