So because the official numbers , which are verified, are looking too good, you now have to add some nebulous additional factor? Unemployment is unemployment. Looking at speculative "non participation of the labour force" is ridiculous. When you add those figures to the unemployment under Bush where do his stats reach?
On 2 November 2012 17:46, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Really? You present a facebook graph as an argument? > > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/10/11/obamas-real-unemployment-rate-is-14-7-and-a-recessions-on-the-way/ > > or this: > > > http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/080312-621034-real-unemployment-much-higher-than-white-house-claims.htm?p=full > > . > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Actually guys, > > > > Here's the truth and a graph showing exactly what happened with the > > unemployement rate since Barak took office. > > > > Sam, for you in particular :) > > > > > https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/196160_10151246112671749_2101778253_n.jpg > > > > http://www.barackobama.com/jobsrecord > > > > And this is why I am saying that I am confused. > > > > The argument that the jobs aren't coming back fast enough is a specious > one > > which is impossible to prove > > that anyone else could have done it better. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357501 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
