That still depends on who provides the stats.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/115147268/Youth-Disrupted-Effects-of-U-S-Drone-Strikes-on-Children-in-Targeted-Areas


And your improvement is based on one attack in 2006 that killed so
many children. But is it accurate to say that it was a US Drone or
that children even died?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chenagai_airstrike

According to the American Broadcasting Company, the attack was
launched by a MQ-1 Predator with Ayman al-Zawahiri as its intended
target.[6] However, the report's author has since been removed from
ABC's site due to questions concerning the reliability of his
reporting.
In Afghanistan, U.S. military spokesman Maj. Matt Hackathorn denied
the U.S. was involved in the strike. "It was completely done by the
Pakistani military," he told the Associated Press. A spokesman for the
Pakistani Foreign Office also denied involvement of any external
influence or pressure, saying of the airstrike, "It is something that
we have done and we have been doing for peace and security in our own
region".[7]
Local people claimed the victims included boys as young as 12 but
Pakistani officials insisted they had been shown satellite images of
people training and had checked the identity cards of all those
killed, and that all were adults. [8]

One can easily choose the results that suits them.

.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson <jmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I dont know that it matters (for my point) who defines other, or civilian,
> as long as the metrics stay the same (so that #s and categorization methods
> remains the same).
>
> The metrics are improving.
>
> overall debate about categorization and counting methodologies is still
> useful, as is comparison of "collateral" damage using other methods of
> warfare (traditional bombing, "boots on the ground" attacks, helicopters,
> missiles, etc)
>
> but in my mind, using this chart as my _only_ information (which isnt
> true), I come to the conclusion that this program is working, and getting
> better over time.
>
>
>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362115
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to