I'd say bear and not infringed On Apr 11, 2013 3:09 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that one is right beside arming bears - although frankly I don't > think that bears need the extra help. At least it bears some more thinking. > The alternative is unbearable. > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:09 AM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If that's it and we undo all the other dumb shit like class 3 laws and > > > capacity laws, and require JUDICIAL due process for incompetency > > decisions. > > > > > > > I agree with judicial review for incompetency decisions. No bureaucrat > > needs to be deciding that. It needs full due process. > > > > > > > > And recognize constitutional concealed carry nationwide. > > > > > > > I don't see an constitutional right for concealed carry. Can you point > me > > to some information? > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362630 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
