On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The problem, Sam, is that the 'arguments' are not based in science, in any > way, shape of form. > > What are some SCIENTIFIC arguments against the theory of relativity? > http://aetherforce.com/electrical-engineer-disproves-einsteins-relativity-theory-the-ruins-of-106-years-relativity/ > What are some SCIENTIFIC arguments against the theory of evolution? > Do humans evolve or did every living thing on earth evolve from the same living cell? > What are some SCIENTIFIC arguments against the theory of gravity? > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space You need to stop thinking in absolutes. Questions are good. Keep asking them. . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366983 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
