On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The problem, Sam, is that the 'arguments' are not based in science, in > any > > way, shape of form. > > > > What are some SCIENTIFIC arguments against the theory of relativity? > > > > > http://aetherforce.com/electrical-engineer-disproves-einsteins-relativity-theory-the-ruins-of-106-years-relativity/
Funny...no mention of an invisible being having anything to do with it. > > > > > > What are some SCIENTIFIC arguments against the theory of evolution? > > > > Do humans evolve or did every living thing on earth evolve from the same > living cell? > All creatures evolve Sam. The fact that you asked this question leads me to believe you do not fully understand evolution. > > > > What are some SCIENTIFIC arguments against the theory of gravity? > > > > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space > > You need to stop thinking in absolutes. Questions are good. Keep asking > them. > Again, no mention of mythological creatures causing this to happen. I have no problem with science questioning science...as a matter of fact, I think science should be questioned. Just not by, what is essentially, mythology. > > . > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366985 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
