On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Sam - you are so dense sometimes I swear you must be faking it.
>
> Creationism is NOT an alternative to evolution as evolution is not about
> the origin of life - where as creationism is.
>
>
Finally we agree.


> I would have no issues at all with scientific arguments against evolution
> being introduces, however...there are none.


While we agree that life evolves, we don't seem to know what it started
from. So there is a lot of  research still to be done to understand
evolution.

>
> The only arguments involve
> mythological beings creating all life in a week, or other such stories. Not
> science, but religion or mythology. Based on your point of view,
> Bullfinch's Mythology should be accepted scientific textbooks.
>

You just said evolution isn't about origins but then say the only argument
against is an argument about origins. Pull yourself together man!

.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367002
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to