> How do you explain the new settlements that were built and are being built > in Gaza? > Untrue. Israel TOTALLY left Gaza years ago. There are no Jews in Gaza. No settlements being built in Gaza. Where did you hear this from so I know never to trust it.
> And we aren't talking about Syria, or Italy. We are talking about Israel. > Right, but if you don't have the same feelings when you substitute another country's name, then you being biased and should take a step back. > If Italy fired missiles at hospitals, water treatment facilities, schools, > houses etc. hell no I would not ever defend that. > Even if they were also used as military locations such as missile launch sites? > What there is to understand is 230+ people dead, including women and > children. Innocent civilians. > Yes, many of those were innocent civilians who should never have been told by their leaders to come to a target site (as Hamas has). Any civilian death is tragic and should be avoided in the utmost. Israel tries to avoid it. Hamas goes out of their way to target civilians. And BTW, they were not all civilians: http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/article/20674 And they were killed by Israeli military action. Nothing else matters, and > there is nothing to rationalise. > Except when your government goes out of its way to make their own people targets such as launching missiles from civilian locations and telling civilians to come to target locations: http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=12019 > Did the children that died pray for death at the hands of Israeli military? > Actually, some did pray to become martyrs. That's the screwed up education they are being fed by Hamas. I assume you saw the video of the called off air strike because of kids in the target area? > If not then maybe God has nothing to do with this. > Kill them all and let God sort them out. Was that an American saying or older? > ᧠> On 17 July 2014 14:36, Michael Dinowitz <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> > wrote: > > > > > Most of those resolutions are one sided and America is totally right to > > veto them. When they cover both sides of the issue then the chances of a > > veto is slim. America does not automatically veto every resolutions, just > > the ones that should be. Look them up. > > > > So if Italy was attacked by France and shot back, you would say to invade > > Italy, not France? > > > > And as for a previous post, Israel has bent over backwards for peace. > They > > removed EVERY Jew from Gaza, in some cases by force. Gaza is totally Jew > > free and under Hamas's control. They did that for peace. They've released > > terrorists by the hundreds to get Abbas to sit at the table for peace and > > it led nowhere. Abbas even laughed at how he got hundreds of prisoners > free > > and didn't give anything in return. > > > > The bottom line problem is that you see Israel as an invader, not at the > > aboriginal people of the area. We Jews have our origin there, have prayed > > for return there, have been there for generations, have archeological > proof > > of our existence there, etc. WE are aboriginal people to that area. To > deny > > that is to deny thousands of years of provable history. If you accept > that > > we are not invaders and that we have a right to be there, then all of a > > sudden this stops being an invader vs. native issue. If you actually go > the > > extra step and understand the cultures of the area, then things get even > > more interesting. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371720 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
