For historical purposes, absolutely On Jul 17, 2014 4:05 PM, "Maureen" <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Aboriginal people? So that whole Exodus, Promised Land thing that > tells when and how the Hebrews arrived in that area, we should just > ignore? > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Michael Dinowitz > <mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > > > The bottom line problem is that you see Israel as an invader, not at the > > aboriginal people of the area. We Jews have our origin there, have prayed > > for return there, have been there for generations, have archeological > proof > > of our existence there, etc. WE are aboriginal people to that area. To > deny > > that is to deny thousands of years of provable history. If you accept > that > > we are not invaders and that we have a right to be there, then all of a > > sudden this stops being an invader vs. native issue. If you actually go > the > > extra step and understand the cultures of the area, then things get even > > more interesting. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371725 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
