1. According to this site, the 'war' has already started in some small way (http://debka.com/)/. 2. A major reason not to attack Iraq is to avoid Armageddon. Think about it, last time Saddam decided to try to get Israel into the war by launching missiles at them. Israel didn't nuke him back to the dawn of time due to American pressure. This time around Saddam would launch WMD missiles at Israel and Israel would be forced to remove Iraq from existence. That would start the next middle east war in which Pakistan, Iran, India, and just about everyone else would weigh in. "Armageddon days are here (again)" I say a nice series of assasinations will do the job. No land war, no missiles, no fuss, no muss.
> Hopefully, GW has learned to read and at a level that allows him to comprehend the >consequences involved with an attack > on Iraq. There have been several well-written articles on the subject recently and >this is a particularly good one: > > http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-bandow081202.asp > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
