That is true. Several of his family members etc..may seem to hold the same idealistic views as Saddam, but are simply afraid of him and what he may do if they speak out againt him. Was it not Saddam who had his sisters husband killed for views that was not liken to his own?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq > Assassination is a very serious business. You can take him out with reason. You can take out some of his kids with reason as well. His clan on the other hand may not warrant being removed. You have to give them the benefit of the doubt until they do something that says they deserve it. > > > re assassinations - > > > > will we take out his whole clan in Tikrit? > > > > like the Saudis, Saddam has a whole passel of relatives > > to take over for him. some are as ruthless as he, if not > > more so, but without any judgement born of experience. > > > > remember also that the Ba'ath Party (Saddam's) is Sunni > > Moslem, the vast majority of the country is Shi'a. > > > > -Ben > > > > > 1. According to this site, the 'war' has already started in some small way > > > (http://debka.com/)/. > > > 2. A major reason not to attack Iraq is to avoid Armageddon. Think about it, > > > last time Saddam decided to try to get Israel into the war by launching missiles > > > at them. Israel didn't nuke him back to the dawn of time due to American > > > pressure. This time around Saddam would launch WMD missiles at Israel and Israel > > > would be forced to remove Iraq from existence. That would start the next middle > > > east war in which Pakistan, Iran, India, and just about everyone else would > > > weigh in. > > > "Armageddon days are here (again)" > > > I say a nice series of assasinations will do the job. No land war, no missiles, > > > no fuss, no muss. > > > > > > > Hopefully, GW has learned to read and at a level that allows him to comprehend > > > the consequences involved with an attack > > > > on Iraq. There have been several well-written articles on the subject > > > recently and this is a particularly good one: > > > > > > > > http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-bandow081202.asp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
