I wouldn't say it's "easier" although I would accept the idea that killing someone from range is not the same as killing someone with your hands or at point blank. That there exists, in most people, some psychological difference.
Having seen the crime scene photos from the Danny Rollings slayings in Gainesville, Florida back in the early 90s, and other autopsy photos of "knifing" victims, I would say that knives are a thousand times more vicious than any gun. Look what 19 men did with box cutters, against almost 300 unarmed people. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:27 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: England's Crime Rate highest in the world OJ didn't kill Nicole either. The unknown person did. <snicker, snicker> Don't you think it's a lot easier to kill somebody with a gun than a knife? That's why I suggested that. Also, I defend the 2nd amendment. I'm not pro-nra, but I am 100% sure that the founding fathers intended for Americans to keep arms in order to keep the government in check should it ever become tyrannical, as the situation was in the 1700s when the US declared independence from a (then) tyrannical England. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
