Problem is that simple list learning, and similar repetitive learning 
tasks,  are not really a good measure of real learning.  Also I would 
suspect that you'd have very different results if you looked at your 
subject's attentional abilities beforehand.


larry

At 03:40 PM 12/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Temporary is all that you need when dealing with information and repetition.
>REST+hypnotic state+information = information retention
>For those in the dark, REST is Reduced Environmental Stimulation. It's 
>basically
>removing all stimulation from a subject (sound, light, etc.). This causes the
>senses to become hyper alert as they look for some form of stimulation. At 
>this
>point, any introduced stimulation has a profound effect on the subject.
>For those in the know, yes this sounds exactly like many forms of 
>brainwashing.
>We're just looking at it for its positive effects. :)
>
>
> > REST is a very interesting area. One colleague of my advisor, a guy named
> > Barabasz, did some very interesting work in that area, he looked at EEG,
> > and REST, and observed changes in attentional processing and
> > hypnotizability over time. However changes were only temporary.
> >
> > larry
> >
> >
> > At 03:04 PM 12/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > >One of my papers in experimental was on REST and learning. Brainwash your
> > >friends to learn better. :)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Can't say the same about myself. My dissertation was on attentional
> > > > processing and hypnotic susceptibility. To get an adequate sample size
> > > > (equal number of people who were highly, moderately and not very
> > > > hypnotizable) we assessed about 2000 people on their responsiveness to
> > > > hypnosis. It worked out to be around 500 people per semester.
> > > >
> > > > Then after the initial screenings I had to reassess the 160 people on a
> > > > more complex and demanding hypnotizabilty measure. Eventually I 
> ended up
> > > > with about 40 in each of the high, medium and low hypnotizable groups.
>Then
> > > > I had to do the actual study, (more on that some other time).
> > > >
> > > > The funny thing of it was is that after I learned and was certified in
> > > > hypnosis, I ended up not being very responsive to it. It wasn't that
> > > > anything changed, I just got too critical of the techniques being used.
> > > >
> > > > larry
> > > >
> > > > At 04:24 PM 12/2/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > >On a mundane level I can alter the list software to never send a post
>from
> > > > >me to
> > > > >you and I can alter the archives to generate a thread that's missing
> > > all of
> > >my
> > > > >posts. A bit of work, but well within the abilities of the code.
> > > > >As for Judith's comment, I'm a total innocent and have never 
> hypnotized
> > >anyone
> > > > >for any reason but good. Just ask my vict.. patients. I mean patients,
> > >they're
> > > > >patients.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you really want me to? truly? You know, I'm very good at what
> > > I do.
> > >;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can make me ignore you?
> > > > > > Judith, is this true?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to