What I find worrying is that a copy of the Quran has been entered into evidence. I would think that it would be plainly obvious by now to everyone that basing a court decision in any manner on a religious belief is not allowed anywhere in the US.
I'm not sure about the process, but I think the prosecution would be within it's rights to ask that it be made inadmissible as evidence. Perhaps they are angling for a guaranteed way to appeal though. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 2:35:57 PM, you wrote: RC> Why would this even be going to trial? Do you have the consitutional RC> right to get a drivers license? Why doesn't she simply take a bus then? RC> -rc >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:31 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Makes you shake your head. >> >> >> I can't believe this woman was allowed to take a driver's >> license photo with a veil in the first place. Additionally, >> if she wants to take the photo veiled, does that mean she'll >> be driving veiled too. Isn't that just a tad bit dangerous.... >> >> RC> http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/28/license.veil.ap/index.html RC> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
