um, I can't parse the first statement and don't see the point of the second. It's WEN Ho and I doubt you mean to say you broke the law. I assume you are saying he did, so it clear you still haven't done any research.
As for Reid, In a memorandum opinion issued last year, Young set out the rationale for federal court prosecutions of terrorist suspects in more positive terms. Reminding prosecutors of the importance of subjecting their cases to "formal proof beyond a reasonable doubt," he noted that by bringing a case to trial in a public courtroom, the government "invigorates and strengthens our democracy . . . and demonstrates to the world at large its absolute faith in the strength and independence of our institutions. http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/03/findlaw.analysis.mariner.moussaoui/ But I doubt that is what you are talking about. Dana illiam Wheatley writes: > you're right if i was talking about when ho i shouldn't have broken the law > ;) > > I was talking about the comments about richard reid. > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!" > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:27 PM > Subject: Re: A good american > > > > happened under Clinton > > > > William Wheatley writes: > > > > > Nice comments by the judge. :) At least the judge didn't fall in line > with > > > all of Bushs Enemy combatant shit. > > > > > > > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was > good > > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people > off!" > > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:17 PM > > > Subject: RE: A good american > > > > > > > > > > Sort of. I happened to just get it from my father, and it seemed > mildly > > > > related to the whole American judicial system with regards to crap. > > > > (It's late and I've run out of brain. "Crap" is the best word I'm > coming > > > > up with right now.) > > > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:53 PM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: A good american > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > At first glance those cases seem totally different. One guy > > > > > pled guilty and another innocent. One was found guilty, the > > > > > other innocent. So I was wondering why you posted that > > > > > speech. Then I realized that both judges were talking abot > > > > > American justice.....is that it? > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
