I pass. It's just not worth it. Dana
William Wheatley writes: > LOL Ok i'll go over it again i was saying nice comments that kevin posted > about the judge in the reid case. Nothing to do whatsoever with the guy who > broke the law and was accused of something more then he did and yadda yadda. > > I was just saying it very good comments. > > And he DID break the rules, he broke the rule whatever you yourself said he > did. You said they had an unwritten rule where people took things out of > secure areas and he did it...he broke the law. I did not say he spied or did > whatever he was accused of doing. > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!" > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:54 PM > Subject: Re: A good american > > > > um, I can't parse the first statement and don't see the point of the > > second. It's WEN Ho and I doubt you mean to say you broke the law. I > assume > > you are saying he did, so it clear you still haven't done any research. > > > > As for Reid, > > > > In a memorandum opinion issued last year, Young set out the rationale for > > federal court prosecutions of terrorist suspects in more positive terms. > > Reminding prosecutors of the importance of subjecting their cases to > > "formal proof beyond a reasonable doubt," he noted that by bringing a case > > to trial in a public courtroom, the government "invigorates and > strengthens > > our democracy . . . and demonstrates to the world at large its absolute > > faith in the strength and independence of our institutions. > > > > http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/03/findlaw.analysis.mariner.moussaoui/ > > > > But I doubt that is what you are talking about. > > > > Dana > > > > illiam Wheatley writes: > > > > > you're right if i was talking about when ho i shouldn't have broken the > law > > > ;) > > > > > > I was talking about the comments about richard reid. > > > > > > > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was > good > > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people > off!" > > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:27 PM > > > Subject: Re: A good american > > > > > > > > > > happened under Clinton > > > > > > > > William Wheatley writes: > > > > > > > > > Nice comments by the judge. :) At least the judge didn't fall in > line > > > with > > > > > all of Bushs Enemy combatant shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was > > > good > > > > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people > > > off!" > > > > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:17 PM > > > > > Subject: RE: A good american > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sort of. I happened to just get it from my father, and it seemed > > > mildly > > > > > > related to the whole American judicial system with regards to > crap. > > > > > > (It's late and I've run out of brain. "Crap" is the best word I'm > > > coming > > > > > > up with right now.) > > > > > > > > > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:53 PM > > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > > Subject: A good american > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At first glance those cases seem totally different. One guy > > > > > > > pled guilty and another innocent. One was found guilty, the > > > > > > > other innocent. So I was wondering why you posted that > > > > > > > speech. Then I realized that both judges were talking abot > > > > > > > American justice.....is that it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
