Here is the full text of the law:
http://sethf.com/anticensorware/legal/001218cipa.html

I don't have a major problem with it, however, I do know that there is no
good blocking software, however, if a Library is not going to maintain
x-rated movies or skin magazines, then why allow access to porn on the net.

The purpose of pornography is to arouse, it is not for any artistic value. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:23 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Porn in the Library
> 
> I honestly don't find it troubling.
> 
> I fully support people viewing legal material, but having seen some
> stuff that is pretty easy to stumble upon, I think other people in a
> public environment shouldn't be forced to see it as well, either through
> accident or because someone else in the computer area is surfing porn.
> 
> Also, having worked in places where people have publicly masturbated, I
> don't have a problem with doing something to curb that behavior and to
> help librarians not be put into a situation of dealing with it. (BTW,
> the places were an office supply store and a resturaunt.) Again, it's
> fine in your own home but just don't do it in public.
> 
> It's a given that the filters are crap. They just don't work to block
> everything they probably should and they block things they probably
> shouldn't. The important parts of the ruling IMO, are 1.) the ability
> for the patron to request their filter to be disabled allows for
> individuals to still control what they want to see; and 2.) that it only
> applies to federal funding. If a library chooses to not receive federal
> funding, then they aren't impacted by the law.
> 
> I don't see this so much of an anti-pornography law as it is a means to
> help librarians and other patrons not to have to deal with someone
> else's lack of basic social mores. If anything about it is troubling,
> it's that things have gotten to a point that a ruling like this even had
> to come up.
> 
> -Kevin
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:10 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Porn in the Library
> >
> >
> > nobody commented on this. Too many other topics, or does
> > nobody else find
> > this slightly troubling?
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0400, Nick McClure
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The supreme court upheld the law requiring public libraries
> > to install
> > > porn
> > > filters on public computers. Claiming that if research is
> > hampered the
> > > filters can be turned off.
> > >
> > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?C21C62405
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nick McClure
> > > TransDigital
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to