Nah, that's old school. We don't even have to do the threatening anymore - we'll just arm their closest (and preferably craziest, most religious) neighbor with enough weaponry to scare whatever country it is we're targeting into doing something stupid - like talk sh*t about the US supplying their neighbor with weapons, or even possibly try building weapons to defend themselves from religious, crazy invasion - 'your great uncle shot my holy goat, eat $2M patriot missle scum - ah lalalalala'. Yes, these are the people we're arming. If we haven't achieved our goal within 10 years, which is enough time for the majority of our public to forget about us having any involvement, we just need point to their weapons, wave a couple orange bottles and fake satellite images on TV, and then bomb them under the guise of defense and liberation. A perk to this is that our white collar welfare system (defense industry) stays nice and fat - to the tune of $380B on this last round - "we goin to sizzler, it's our birthday, gonna get me an Escalade" - *does that stupid cake mixing dance*. What helps things move along smoothly is when crazies get fed up with everything and fly planes into our buildings - don't even have to wait 10 years then. They're just liberal New Yorkers anyway - and they're probably gay - stupid Hillary Clinton.
Ahh anyway - enough conspiracy theory for now - back to work. Adam. >Let me break it down for you: > >"Do what we say, or else...." > >Check a dictionary for the definition of a threat. > >I think it obtuse to not admit that the US is threatening smaller >countries with withdrawal of support if they go along with the ICC. > >Argue all you like whether the ICC is a valid entity, whether the US >should be a part of it or not. > >But don't argue a fact that it is threatening smaller countries. > >I suppose if OPEC said if the US doesn't withdraw from IRAQ it would >stop selling oil to the US...that wouldn't be a 'threat'. >*shakes head* > >-Gel > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Funny the subject said something about threatening. I see no threats. >I mean withholding defense money from other nations isn't a threat, it's >international politics. Threats are "we are going to invade you if you >don't......". > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
