Ahhh.. So therefore you are admitting that the United States only offers assistance to countries in order to force them to the will of the US at a later date.
Cool. I hope you remember that point in future discussions. And the war on Iraq was for what? 'Liberation of the Iraqi people'? So....I suppose the US will soon 'Call in the debt'....after all... isn't it fair to expect a return on their investment? -Gel -----Original Message----- From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that threat implies violence. When you are receiving hand outs you have to be prepared to bend to your supporters will. This is true at all levels. This is why only trade, based on an equal exchange of valued items (this is true even in relationships, where the item to be exchanged can be as simple as time spent together). When one is supporting the other eventually the supporter will call due the debit. I don't consider this a threat. I consider it justice. If you want our money you have do to something for us. If you would rather follow your own will you can be without our money. It's a decision on your part. How is what we are doing in this instance wrong. morally or legally? Should we not expect some return on our investment? Tim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
