If Mont. County has to enact a ban, doesn't that mean that the state doesn't
have one for bars, restaurants etc?  I mean if the state had one, why would
MC need one as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Where are the non-smokers?


that's Mont. County not the state of Maryland ;) no worries though just
having trouble finding where the Original statewide law was overturned.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sandy Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: Where are the non-smokers?


>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A6
> 0687-2003Jul1&notFound=true
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:45 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Where are the non-smokers?
>
>
> hrm News to me i lived in MD until 2001
> i don't see anything about it being overruled let me look some more. I was
> in smoking restaurants too when they had bars in them.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:30 PM
> Subject: RE: Where are the non-smokers?
>
>
> > Nope,
> >
> > It was poorly worded and ruled unconstitutional shortly after it was
> > implemented.
> >
> > BTW I was smoking in a restaurant in Cascades, MD during drill this
> weekend.
> >
> > Timothy Heald
> > Information Systems Specialist
> > Overseas Security Advisory Council
> > U.S. Department of State
> > 571.345.2235
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:25 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Where are the non-smokers?
> >
> >
> > Umm unless MD repealed the smoking ban then yes there is defiantly a
> smoking
> > ban. You can smoke where there is a bar but that is it.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:44 PM
> > Subject: Where are the non-smokers?
> >
> >
> > > Maryland as a state does not have a smoking ban.  Montgomery County
> passed
> > a smoking ban which was overturned recently on a technicality. They have
> > since passed another ban which (hopefully) will pass muster.
> > >
> > > I lived in CA and really loved being able to go out to clean
restaurants
> > and  bars after the statewide ban. In terms of anectodal evidence, I
asked
> a
> > waitress at a coffee shop how the ban in CA had affected her. She told
me
> > she loved it, that not only was it healthier for her, but also that
people
> > didn't stay and smoke for hours and hog a table.  Turning the tables
over
> > meant she made more in tips.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >hehe yea MD was i think the 1st or 2nd state to have a statewide
> smoking
> > > >ban. I think it was first
> > > >with CA being second with a FAR stricker rule but it was defiantly
> sweet
> > > >living in such a great state.
> > > >
> > > >I miss my old maryland *sniff*
> > > >
> > > >:)
> > > >----- Original Message ----- 
> > > >From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:05 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: Where are the non-smokers?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> exactly. And bars and restaurants are different cases; bars
probably
> do
> > > >> have a higher percentage of smoker patrons.
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems to me that Montgomery County MD was non-smoking ten years ago
> and
> > it
> > > >> certainly has a healthy population of restaurants. I will grant
that
> > the
> > > >> overall affluent demographic there may be a factor in this but
> > > >demographics
> > > >> in general play into this a lot. Smoking it less common among the
> > > >educated,
> > > >> I seem to remember reading; assuming that is true a blue-collar bar
> > > >> conceivably could lose business if all its mechanic/tow truck
driver
> > > >> customers decide to get a six pack and hang out at each other's
> houses
> > > >> instead of going out.... I know that's a stereotype but I am just
> > giving
> > > >an
> > > >> example.
> > > >>
> > > >> Dana
> > > >>
> > > >> Ian Skinner writes:
> > > >>
> > > >> > The other way that "up too" could be misleading is of only one
> > > >establishment
> > > >> > lost that much business for this or any other fact, they are then
> > held
> > > >up as
> > > >> > both the example and the reason you can say up too... even if all
> the
> > > >other
> > > >> > places are not suffering like this.....
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --------------
> > > >> > Ian Skinner
> > > >> > Web Programmer
> > > >> > BloodSource
> > > >> > Sacramento, CA
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:51 AM
> > > >> > To: CF-Community
> > > >> > Subject: Re: Where are the non-smokers?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I question whethet this is in fact the case. Somebody somewhere
has
> > > >> > probably studied it but I don't have any statistics to hand.
Still,
> > that
> > > >> > link wasnproof of anything either.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Dana
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Matthew Small writes:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Actually, I don't ever think there was a message that
non-smokers
> > did
> > > >not
> > > >> > > frequent bars & restaurants because of smoking.  the ban was to
> > > >> > non-smokers
> > > >> > > that work in those places, and to protect non-smoking customers
> > from
> > > >being
> > > >> > > exposed to smoker's air.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > That being said, and the fact that I have fully supported the
> > smoking
> > > >ban
> > > >> > in
> > > >> > > a restaurant, if the facts are true that banning smoking is
> causing
> > > >> > > restaurants to lose that much (30% - 50%) of their business,
then
> I
> > > >> > support
> > > >> > > repealing the ban in favor of very stringent rules for
separating
> > the
> > > >> > > smoking section from a non-smoking section - e.g. completely
> > enclosed
> > > >> > > smoking areas, different ventilation systems, etc.  Of course,
> that
> > > >does
> > > >> > not
> > > >> > > protect the non-smoking workers. I don't know what to do about
> > them.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > - Matt Small
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> > > From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >> > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:54 AM
> > > >> > > Subject: RE: Where are the non-smokers?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Well...
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It does say something about Non Smokers.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > If you ban smoking...and you lose 20% to 50% of your sales...
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Then that means you have lost smoking customers.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It also means that those smoking customers whom you have
lost,
> > have
> > > >> > > > *not* been replaced with non-smoking customers.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Part of the reasoning for the ban was that there were
thousands
> > of
> > > >> > > > non-smokers that do not frequent bars and restaurants because
> of
> > the
> > > >> > > > smoke,ergo if there was no smoking these people would
patronise
> > > >these
> > > >> > > > institutions.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > -Gel
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > That doesn't say anything about non smokers it simply says
the
> > > >smokers
> > > >> > > > are going where they can still pollute the air thats all.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to