Or many other regiments that day.

That was after months of training. I'm talking about someone who is
while reasonably fit , isn't at the same level as a fully trained
light infantry soldier. And trudging through 50 miles of swamp and
end stage spruce bog is not easy even for a Ranger. Someone from JTF2
or SAS perhaps or someone who grew up in the area, but me, no thanks.

larry

>Larry that doesn't mean with a swiss seat a 100 meters of cord and a little
>training they couldn't make it through.  Look at the rangers on D-Day.
>
>
>Your thinking about Joe Schmo not a soldier/terrorist.
>
>Timothy Heald
>Web Portfolio Manager
>Overseas Security Advisory Council
>U.S. Department of State
>571.345.2319
>
>The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
>Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
>opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
>unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:16 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>
>Look up where the Northern Angle is on the Minnesota/Ontario/Manitoba
>borders. Not fun stuff to go waltzing through.
>
>larry
>
>At 04:03 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>>I'll pony up the cash....  You're talking to an ex-Marine here.  :-)
>>
>>Matt Small
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Larry C. Lyons
>>   To: CF-Community
>>   Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:53 PM
>>   Subject: Re: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>
>>   NO I am saying that the vast majority of the border is secured and those
>>   areas that are not are typically very difficult to walk across. Look at
>>  the
>>   border in Northwestern Ontario. That's mainly swamp, trees and lakes.
>Also
>>   while they do not advertise it, even in these areas they are placing
>>   electronic sensors etc to detect intrusions.
>>
>>   As for my assumption, if you're willing to pay for it, I can take you to
>>   some places along the border, and I'd love to see you traverse it. I'll
>>   even hold onto the rope to haul you out when you go in over your head.
>>
>>   larry
>>
>>   At 02:54 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>>   >I thought Tim already did that. Do I need to find a thousand more
>>   >instances or will his do?  I distinctly remember that instance as the
>US
>>   >was worried that an attack would happen on the new millenium eve, and
>in
>>   >fact that's what I was thinking of when I wrote it.  After 911, there
>was
>>   >a lot of talk that terrorists would come into the US from Canada.  I
>>  don't
>>   >know where this intelligence came from, but it was in the nightly
>>   >news.  I'm not making up lies, there's at least this one instance and
>I'm
>>   >sure there are more.
>>   >
>>   >You're saying that the entire 3000+ mile border between the US and
>Canada
>>   >is entirely unnavigable by foot?  OK, that's ridiculous  - you're
>making
>>   >assertions that are unfounded.  I'm sure you haven't been along the
>>  entire
>>   >length of the border.  My assumption that it is possible to traverse
>the
>>   >border in an unattended area somewhere is far more plausible than your
>>   >assumption that it's not.
>>   >
>>   >- Matt Small
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >----- Original Message -----
>>   >   From: Larry C. Lyons
>>   >   To: CF-Community
>>   >   Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:32 PM
>>   >   Subject: Re: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>   >
>>   >   The please show this so-called documentation, just don't make
>>  assertions
>>   >   about it. Just saying its so doesn't make it true.
>>   >
>>   >   I take it you've never been to the border, yes there are areas
>>  where it is
>>   >   difficult to patrol, for very good reason, its swamp and rock. Its
>not
>>   >   something where you can just stroll through. Even the locals in
>these
>>   >   places would not try to go through the areas. I know I spent a lot
>>  of time
>>   >   as a kid in northwestern Ontario very close to the border. It went
>  > through
>>   >   areas where you don't want to go through, unless you have no qualms
>>  about
>>   >   being up to your neck in swamp and bog.
>>   >
>>   >   larry
>>   >
>>   >   At 12:15 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>>   >   >Excuse me, I meant that Middle-Eastern Terrorists are known to
>>  come into
>>   >   >the US via Canada. This was publicized on national news shows
>>  after 911.
>>   >   >Gosh, with this kind of story, if I were a terrorist, I would go
>>  through
>>   >   >Canada - why would I even take the chance on being taken in at US
>>  Customs
>>   >   >only to be deported and tortured?  The fact that it has a HUGE
>>   > unpatrolled
>>   >   >border with the US makes it a prime entry target.   Whether or not
>you
>>   >   >believe it that is a matter of personal choice.  I'm sure there's
>>   >   >documentation on it where it did happen as well your documentation
>>  below.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >- Matthew Small
>>   >   >
>>   >   >----- Original Message -----
>>   >   >   From: Dharmesh Goel
>>   >   >   To: CF-Community
>>   >   >   Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:49 AM
>>   >   >   Subject: RE: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   Hi Mathew,
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   I strongly disagree with
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   "The publicized fact that is that Middle-Easterners are known
>>  to come
>>   >   > into the US via Canada."
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   This is a case of if a lie is told over and over again, people
>will
>>   >   > start believing it. The last time I checked, borders are manned
>and
>>   >   > controlled by US Immigration and customs at points of entry.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   Here is a discussion on this:
>>   >   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>
>><http://www.cbc.ca/disclosure/archives/documents/030211_blamecanada_buchana
>n.html>http://www.cbc.ca/disclosure/archives/documents/030211_blamecanada_bu
>chanan.html
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   Another article:
>>   >   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>
>><http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2003/01/19/fObserver172.raw.html>http://ww
>w.herald.ns.ca/stories/2003/01/19/fObserver172.raw.html
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   Tons of discussion on this topic out there in cyberspace.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   Some excerpts
>>   >   >   ------------------------
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: I'm sure you remember this whole incident over the
>New
>>   > Year
>>   >   > period, where there was this alert that there were five men in the
>>   > United
>>   >   > States.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: Mm hmm.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: And reports were that they had come from Canada,
>>  somehow
>>   >   > related to terrorism.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: And it was a hoax.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: And it was a hoax.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: Right.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: So, what do you make of that?
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: Well it was a hoax but [laugh] they probably felt that
>>   >   > because it was from Canada it would be believed, is my guess.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: Well is that fair?
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   ------------------------
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: -you've got a situation in this country where you
>>  had 19
>>   >   > hijackers coming through the front door, now where's the problem?
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: Well it -Look the- Clearly the United States is the
>>  target.
>>   >   > And they come into our airports, they come through Canada, they
>come
>>   >   > through Mexico, so let's tighten-
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: Well they- who comes through Canada?
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: Well- Look. We've already been over this, but-
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: Who comes through Canada though? Has there been an
>>   > incident
>>   >   > with somebody who comes through-
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: Well there are many terrorists as you know, so,
>>  [laugh] that
>>   >   > have been sitting there almost operating freely-
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: Well-
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   BUCHANAN: -up in Canada.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   DISCLOSURE: Well so you say, but where's the terrorist
>incidents?
>>   >   >   ---------------------
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   Dharmesh
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   -----Original Message-----
>  >   >   >   From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   >   >   Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:38 PM
>>   >   >   To: CF-Community
>>   >   >   Subject: Re: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   The publicized fact that is that Middle-Easterners are known to
>>  come
>>   >   > into the US via Canada.  This is a suspicious situation, plain and
>>   >   > simple.  I didn't agree with the fact that he was tortured or
>>   >   > deported.  I said it was suspicious and I believe the right thing
>>  to do
>>   >   > is to question further. You don't have to give me one, the one
>>  taints
>>   > the
>>   >   > other two.  I don't like a lot of things going on with this kind
>of
>>   >   > interrogation, but they were right on the money in detaining him
>for
>>   >   > further questioning.  Bigoted?  How about realistic.  Lots of
>people
>>   > have
>>   >   > been "further questioned" for far less, including myself.  I'm a
>>  young
>>   >   > white southern male.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >   - Matt Small
>>   >   >
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     ----- Original Message -----
>>   >   >     From: Raymond Camden
>>   >   >     To: CF-Community
>>   >   >     Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:37 PM
>>   >   >     Subject: RE: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     Wow, so you listed 3 facts:
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     1) A middle-easterner living in Canada.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     So, is Canada just a bunch of white guys?
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     2) Coming back from a Middle-Eastern country.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     So all Middle-Eastern countries are under suspicion now?
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     3) Known contact with a terrorist.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     Wasn't he a suspected, not proven terrorist? Wasn't the
>>  contact from
>>   >   >     years ago? I can maybe give you this one, but the other two
>are
>>   > simply
>>   >   >     wrong. Bigoted at worst.
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     -rc
>>   >   >
>>   >   >     > -----Original Message-----
>>   >   >     > From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   >   >     > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:40 AM
>>   >   >     > To: CF-Community
>>   >   >     > Subject: Re: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     > A Middle-Easterner living in Canada, coming back from a
>>   >   >     > Middle-Eastern country, known contact with Middle-Eastern
>>   >   >     > terrorists.  That's suspicious.  I didn't say guilty, I said
>>   >   >     > suspicious.
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     > - Matt Small
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >   ----- Original Message -----
>>   >   >     >   From: Raymond Camden
>>   >   >     >   To: CF-Community
>>   >   >     >   Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:22 PM
>>   >   >     >   Subject: RE: The Damasus Holiday Inn...
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >   > I don't agree with the torture and deportation...  but I
>>   >   >     >   > stand by the fact that it's a very suspicious scene.
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >   Why? You said he was middle eastern flying from a islamic
>>   >   >     > country. Is
>>   >   >     >   that something rare? Doesn't this happen thousands of
>times
>>   >   >     > a day? Is it
>>   >   >     >   suspicious to fly home?
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >   -ray
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >     >
>>   >   >
>>   >   >
>>   >   >----------
>>   >   >[
>>   >
>>   >----------
>>   >[
>>
>>----------
>>[
>   _____  
>
>
>[
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to