OK, Beth, you win...  I did sterotype men and women.  I generalized the way that people act in real life.

The whole idea that people don't follow sterotypes at all is just ridiculous.  You want to see some sterotypes?

gay man - Queer Eye for the Straight Guy
hetero man - The Man Show
Conservative Southerner - myself
Liberal Northerners - pick one on this list
Most men are programmers - how many women are on this list compared to men?
Do I need to go on?

I don't believe that all people follow all sterotypes, however, I believe that many people follow many sterotypes.
- Matt Small




  ----- Original Message -----
  From: BethF
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:22 PM
  Subject: Re: You People

  Piggyback becuz I didn't see the original...

  If "women want a huge wedding and men want to elope" then why am I (who wishes to elope) having a huge wedding to accomodate my husband-to-be?  Why did my best friend have to accomodate her husbands wedding wishes, when she just wanted to get married in the courthouse.  And I am certain some male friend has called me an asshole at some point.  And last night I sat on mike's hand and farted.

  Obviously, your stereotpyes dont' apply to everyone.  Thats because they are stereotypes - they aren't based in genetics.  They are cultural norms that folks seem to follow.

  Doesnt' mean we have to follow them, nor does it mean they apply to everyone.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Larry C. Lyons
    To: CF-Community
    Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 7:52 AM
    Subject: Re: You People

    At 11:50 AM 11/18/2003, you wrote:
    >The basic physiological and mental differences between men and women
    >prevent this from happening.  It's like asking why women want a huge
    >wedding when they get married and men want to elope. Have you ever seen a
    >man call a woman an "asshole" as a joke? I do that with my buddies all the
    >time.  When was the last time you saw a woman ask a man to "pull my
    >finger"?  The differences prevent these sorts of things from happening,
    >most of the time.

    Mental Differences? I assume you mean cultural. I hope you mean cultural or
    there are several women on this list that are going to have your skull as a
    drinking cup.

    larry

    >- Matt Small
    >
    >----- Original Message -----
    >   From: Robyn Follen
    >   To: CF-Community
    >   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:32 AM
    >   Subject: RE: You People
    >
    >   What's stopping people from abusing heterosexual marriage for the same
    >   purposes?
    >
    >   -Robyn
    >
    >   -----Original Message-----
    >   From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    >   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:24 AM
    >   To: CF-Community
    >   Subject: RE: You People
    >
    >   I'm not sure this is guilt some much as my stupid-people sense kicking
    >   in. I mean, I'm not rapidly opposed to the idea, I can just see
    >   situations where it might be put to bad use.
    >
    >   Soemthing strikes me as odd when two guys could watch the Red Sox play a
    >   1:00 game, get wasted on Schlitz, and end up at a county courthouse
    >   later that day with the full legal right to get married.  That's not
    >   catholic guilt, that's a joke people were telling back in the 50s.
    >
    >   Or a fraternity could use it as a hazing ritual, getting all the plebes
    >   married off to one another. I have seen this done in mock fashion, and I
    >   know people who would have made kids go all the way (and kids who would
    >   have).
    >
    >   Or a gang thing where you have to prove how hardcore you are.
    >
    >   Imagine if downtrodden men were marrying themselves off to help
    >   immigrants get citizenship. Panhandlers will beat themselves up with
    >   sticks for a $20, why not marriage?
    >
    >   It just strikes me as running counter to the stated aims of the
    >   instituion of marriage, to bring social and financial stablity to a
    >   country. People could easily abuse this for short-term gain, amusement,
    >   status, etc. The bar would need to be set fairly high in order to avoid
    >   the problems that go along with it.
    >
    >   M
    >
    >   -----Original Message-----
    >   From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    >   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:05 AM
    >   To: CF-Community
    >   Subject: RE: You People
    >
    >   >I blame the Liberals on this list for derailing my train of thought.
    >   >Nobody ever talk about same sex marriage again, it gives me the
    >   willies.
    >
    >   That's just your catholic guilt reflex kicking in man.  You'll get over
    >   it
    >   :)
    >
    >   Tim
    >
    >   -----Original Message-----
    >   From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    >   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:05 AM
    >   To: CF-Community
    >   Subject: You People
    >
    >   I had something important I was going to respond to, where someone asked
    >   a question and didn't get a response. I had it all thought out and was
    >   getting ready to put it to email, when someone asked me something about
    >   stylesheets here in the office. I helped him out, then that thread about
    >   Massachusetts came up and I had to post something dumb.
    >
    >   Now I can't remember what I was going to say, or who I was going to
    >   respond to. I looked through all the messages (handily sorted by
    >   Microsoft Outlook 2003, the best email editor there is or ever will be)
    >   and realized I cannot find what I was going to respond to.
    >
    >   ...
    >
    >   I blame the Liberals on this list for derailing my train of thought.
    >   Nobody ever talk about same sex marriage again, it gives me the willies.
    >
    >   M
    >     _____
    >
    >     _____
    >
    >
    >----------
    >[


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to