The UN resolution basically said that if Iraq didn't cooperate with
dismantelling their WMD that we could attack. However, Iraq couldn't
dismantel what they didn't have. So we trumped up evidence to show that they
did. Hence the illegal.

-Kevin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again

> Tell me again how the war was illegal?
>
> The United Nations holds no mandate over our actions.  We are still a
> sovereign nation capable of acting unilaterally.
>
> You might not have thought it was a good idea, but that doesn't make it
> illegal.  Now I would be forced to agree that it was unconstitutional
(read
> illegal) as war was never formally declared, but for some reason we no
> longer feel bound by the constitution in this country.  As most mainstream
> people, both left and right, believe that the constitution is a living,
> interpreted document, you shouldn't complain about that too loudly.  If we
> want to strictly follow one section of the constitution, than all need be
> applied equally (Firearms laws, private property, gov't only getting
> involved in those things that are specifically mentioned in the
> constitution).
>
> Additionally why should we support the economies of nations that in effect
> cost lives of American soldiers?  These supposed allies (whose defense we
> have bled for time and again) refused to take part in the fighting, and
have
> continued to take part in the reconstruction unless we met their demands.
> They don't deserve our money, and make no mistake, this is our money.
>
> I can't agree Kevin.  We are doing nothing wrong here.  We may have erred
in
> invading.  I am sure we have made many mistakes during the occupation.
Yet
> we're still trying to do the right thing there, and the people that
wouldn't
> stand with us during the tough part shouldn't profit now that there is
money
> to be made.
>
> --
> Timothy Heald
> Web Portfolio Manager
> Overseas Security Advisory Council
> U.S. Department of State
> 571.345.2319
>
> The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
> Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
> opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail
is
> unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:29 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Bush gives the finger to the world again
>
>
> Former top U.S. officials are blasting the Bush administration for
reopening
> a rift with Europe by excluding critics of the war from prime contracts
for
> Iraq's reconstruction.
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html
> <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
>
> "I thought we were in the process of acquiring support rather than
> alienating it," former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (search)
said.
>
> So let me get this straight.
>
> 1. Economy is bad.
> 2. Find a patsy country and accuse them of something unfounded.
> 3. Get called on it by other countries.
> 4. Attack anyway
> 5. Deny reconstruction contracts to countries that wouldn't help in an
> illegal war.
>
> And people are complaining? I don't get it. It looks like a perfect plan
to
> boost the economy by giving local companies big contracts.
>
> -Kevin
>   _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to