I'm not completely convinced that the UK's solution was the only or the best
solution.  It may be, but the problem was surrounding by more political
posturing and knee-jerk reactions than science (as I'm sure it will be here
as well).


At the very least by doing that you've just created mountains and mountains
of biohazard waste which has to be dealt with.  The beef industry here is
enormously larger than the UK's - the same solution may not fit the same
problem.


Of course I don't know anything about it really.  I'm strictly a Sunday
morning policy maker.


Jim Davis


  _____  

From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 3:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: List of countries ban US beef imports..


The solution is just what the UK had to do. Slaughter all the animals in
an infected herd if even one shows signs of the disease. Then track back
and see where any cows from that herd went and slaughter those herds
too...etc. etc.

CHeck back previous news coverage of what happened in Europe and how
they dealt with it to see what the US should be doing.

-Gel

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Of course a ban on downed animals (which I generally agree with) would
do
very little to deal with this as the generally accepted cause of the
disease
has a very unpredictable dormancy phase.  Perfectly healthy seeming
animals
can be just as infectious as "downed" animals.

I'm not sure what to do to solve this, but I'm concerned that
reinstating
the ban on downed animals could be seen as a "fix" for this issue when
it's
not.

I wonder if stricter standards on the use of brain/nervous system tissue
would help at all?

Jim Davis

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/2003
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to