to go in for a test two weeks after the procedure - it’s the last major
uncomfortable moment then you’re FREE!)
The procedure is much less invasive and dangerous that tubal ligation – ˝
hour on the table, two days with an ice-pack (and a very attentive wife if
you’re in that position) and you’re done.
Jim Davis
_____
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:33 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day
Wow. Congratulations. At least it sounds like it was a happy surprise.
Hm...I wonder what the failure rate of a vasectomy is.....
-D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marwan Saidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:18 AM
Subject: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day
> Ok, so most of you saw the post where I got a new job offerred on 3 March.
The new job has a ton more responsibility and a hefty compensation increase,
for which I am happy.
>
> However, it was not the biggest news of the day...
>
> Quick Quiz:
>
> Any of you know what the failure rate of a bi-lateral tubal ligation is?
>
> If you answered 0.5%, give yourself a muffin.
>
> Why do I know this?
>
> Well, it's because my wife had one 3.5 years ago when our son was born. He
was going to be our third (and last) child. But I guess Mother Nature didn't
think so, because on the night of 3 March she woke me up to show me a
pregnancy test. A POSITIVE pregnancy test.
>
> Now, after a stressful week (in which we had to get many tests and an
ultrasound to ensure that the pregnancy was not ectopic (tubal)) we know
that we have a normal, healthy pregnancy! (well, normal in all aspects
except that it's NOT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN AT ALL!!!:))
>
> Strange, surreal days, but I am soooo happy!
>
> Thanks for letting me share!
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
