Vasectomies only cut off supply of sperm to the seminal vesicles.
You'll still ejaculate like the porn star you are, it just won't have
anything potentially child-producing inside.
- Jim
brobborb wrote:
>So when u have an orgasm does any kind of fluid come out at all or is it just dry?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Davis
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 8:28 PM
> Subject: RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day
>
>
> Vasectomy failure is pretty rare, and much easier to test (you're supposed
> to go in for a test two weeks after the procedure - it's the last major
> uncomfortable moment then you're FREE!)
>
> The procedure is much less invasive and dangerous that tubal ligation - ½
> hour on the table, two days with an ice-pack (and a very attentive wife if
> you're in that position) and you're done.
>
> Jim Davis
>
> _____
>
> From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:33 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day
>
> Wow. Congratulations. At least it sounds like it was a happy surprise.
> Hm...I wonder what the failure rate of a vasectomy is.....
>
> -D
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marwan Saidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:18 AM
> Subject: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day
>
> > Ok, so most of you saw the post where I got a new job offerred on 3 March.
> The new job has a ton more responsibility and a hefty compensation increase,
> for which I am happy.
> >
> > However, it was not the biggest news of the day...
> >
> > Quick Quiz:
> >
> > Any of you know what the failure rate of a bi-lateral tubal ligation is?
> >
> > If you answered 0.5%, give yourself a muffin.
> >
> > Why do I know this?
> >
> > Well, it's because my wife had one 3.5 years ago when our son was born. He
> was going to be our third (and last) child. But I guess Mother Nature didn't
> think so, because on the night of 3 March she woke me up to show me a
> pregnancy test. A POSITIVE pregnancy test.
> >
> > Now, after a stressful week (in which we had to get many tests and an
> ultrasound to ensure that the pregnancy was not ectopic (tubal)) we know
> that we have a normal, healthy pregnancy! (well, normal in all aspects
> except that it's NOT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN AT ALL!!!:))
> >
> > Strange, surreal days, but I am soooo happy!
> >
> > Thanks for letting me share!
> >
> >
>
> _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Marwan Saidi
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Marlon Moyer
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Erika L Walker-Arnold
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Deanna Schneider
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Jim Davis
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day brobborb
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Phillip B
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Jim Campbell
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Marwan Saidi
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Michael Dinowitz
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Paul Ihrig
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day John Stanley
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Adkins, Randy
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Lyons, Larry
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Marwan Saidi
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Erika L Walker-Arnold
- Re: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Marwan Saidi
- RE: 3 March, 2004 - A Glorious Day Erika L Walker-Arnold