even if the Clinton administration believed there were WMD, they didn't
coerce Congress to go to war about it. There's also a difference between
someone who, when confronted with the truth, is outraged that they too had
been duped vs. someone who continues to recite the lie and tries to continue
duping others.
-Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:28 AM
Subject: Bush criticism hypocracy....
> Interesting...
>
>
> "Some people would like you to think President Bush lied when he talked
> about Saddam Hussein's weapons. The funny thing is, many of the
president's
> current critics are politicians who made strikingly similar claims about
> Iraq in the not-too-distant past. When Bill Clinton was in office, his
> fellow Democrats had much to say about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
> But if you listen to them now, you might conclude that the entire party
> suffers from collective amnesia. Democrats used to talk tough about Iraq.
> They did when one of their own....."
>
>
> http://www.brain-terminal.com/video/nyc-2004-03-20/index.html
> <http://www.brain-terminal.com/video/nyc-2004-03-20/index.html>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
