Hutu militias. Neither France nor the US are guilty of that. At worse what
the US is culpable of is the sin of omission - it did not do anything when
it had the opportunity. France's assistance was more direct, therefore it
should a lot of the blame. That being said, those that were directly
responsible should be actively traced down and brought before the Hague War
Crimes Court.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 8:35 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Rwandan Genocides
>
>
> And that is precisely why one interpretation of aiding and
> abetting the genocides by action/inaction with full knowledge
> of the consequences, is considered Criminally Responsible.
> Vetoing bills that would have increased the number and
> authority of UN forces in Rwanda makes one criminally
> responsible when that action leads to the death of 800,000
> people. And when it was known that the veto would lead to the
> death of several thousand people.
>
> Criminal Responsibility.
>
> -Gel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> A guy I know back in Canada was with the peacekeeping forces
> in Rwanda at the time. He thought that the genocide could
> have been prevented if the UN forces that were already there
> and charged with keeping the peace had been given the
> authority to do so. But because of the UN hindrance, this
> country's indifference and France's collusion, 800,000 people died.
>
> larry
>
>
>
> --
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.7.1 - Release Date: 4/6/2004
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
