Dear Martin

Yes, quite right, thanks. These instructions need to be updated.

Best wishes

Jonathan

----- Forwarded message from Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC 
<martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk> -----

> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:35:38 +0000
> From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk>
> To: "Signell, Richard" <rsign...@usgs.gov>, Daniel Lee
>       <daniel....@eumetsat.int>
> Cc: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed migration of these discussions to GitHub
> 
> Hello Jonathan,
> 
> 
> I also approve of this.
> 
> 
> Perhaps this would be an opportunity to update 
> http://cfconventions.org/discussion.html which appears out of date. Perhaps 
> that page could be retired and replaced with a github page listing the 
> relevant links, including 
> https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md 
> for conventions changes and a new page for standard names.
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> ________________________________
> From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Signell, 
> Richard <rsign...@usgs.gov>
> Sent: 25 March 2019 15:12:57
> To: Daniel Lee
> Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed migration of these discussions to GitHub
> 
> Jonathan & List,
> I strongly agree with this new approach as well.   Technical
> discussions in email are very hard to track, and I believe many people
> who might be contributors don't engage for this reason.   I think
> discussion in Github issues will accelerate our progress.
> 
> Thanks for doing this,
> Rich
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:48 AM Daniel Lee <daniel....@eumetsat.int> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Jonathan, List,
> >
> > I think these changes will be an improvement in how we handle evolving CF. 
> > Your assessment is sound in my eyes and I think these changes will bring 
> > substantial benefits. Thanks for the hard work and attention to detail.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> On Behalf Of
> > > Jonathan Gregory
> > > Sent: Friday 22 March 2019 17:58
> > > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> > > Subject: [CF-metadata] proposed migration of these discussions to GitHub
> > >
> > > Dear all
> > >
> > > As you know, CF currently uses this email list for discussion of standard 
> > > name
> > > proposals and all other matters except for proposals to change the
> > > conventions.
> > >
> > > For the latter, we have been using trac for years, but have recently
> > > completed migration of that function to GitHub. The source of the CF
> > > conventions document is now in GitHub and version 1.7 was generated from
> > > it. In future, proposed conventions changes will be discussed as GitHub
> > > issues on the conventions repository, and the changes in wording will be
> > > finalised in pull requests. This is convenient because it provides 
> > > continuity
> > > from the discussion to the modified document. We are due to prepare and
> > > release version 1.8, freeze trac and publish guidelines for using GitHub 
> > > in
> > > future for conventions changes.
> > >
> > > One of the reasons this has not yet been done is that it's important to 
> > > keep
> > > everyone informed of conventions changes. For a while, postings to the
> > > GitHub conventions repository were sent to the subscribers to this email 
> > > list,
> > > but as you remember there were complaints about the amount of traffic,
> > > and some confusions were caused by people replying to GitHub by email, so
> > > the email feed was switched off while there was further discussion on the 
> > > CF
> > > committee of how to proceed.
> > >
> > > Now we would like to present a new proposal, as follows:
> > >
> > > * To change to using GitHub for standard name proposals and all other
> > > matters, as issues in a different repository from the conventions 
> > > (probably
> > > called "discuss"). If we make this change, anyone who wishes to make a new
> > > standard name proposal or start a discussion thread about something else
> > > will need a GitHub username, and will log on to GitHub and post it there 
> > > as a
> > > new GitHub issue. This is not difficult (see below). It does not involve 
> > > any of
> > > the complexity of git for making updates to a repository as this will be 
> > > a place
> > > solely to hold discussions and keep an archive of them.
> > >
> > > * To make sure that all existing subscribers to this list are kept in 
> > > touch,
> > > postings to the GitHub issues in the discuss and conventions repositories 
> > > will
> > > be distributed via email, initially to all subscribers to this email list.
> > > Their subject lines will begin with [cf-metadata/discuss] and [cf-
> > > metadata/conventions]. However, it will no longer be possible to reply to
> > > them on this email list. The archives will be kept and also copied to 
> > > GitHub. To
> > > comment on a standard name proposal or other discussion, there will be two
> > > options:
> > >
> > > * Either you can log onto GitHub and add to the issue in the discuss
> > > repository,
> > >
> > > * Or you can *unsubscribe* from the broadcast emails (instructions will be
> > > given for that), and instead *watch* the GitHub discuss repository. That
> > > means you will receive the updates to issues by email from GitHub, rather
> > > than via an email list, and you can then reply to GitHub by email. Your 
> > > reply is
> > > magically posted on GitHub. That facility means that you can carry out a
> > > discussion of an issue entirely by email, once it's started, not much
> > > differently from an email list.
> > >
> > > We do not wish to lose members of the CF community who are subscribed to
> > > this list and remain interested in CF. The main reason for my writing 
> > > this now
> > > is to ask whether there are subscribers who would "leave" us because it's
> > > off- putting to use GitHub. Please say if that is what you think before 
> > > 8th
> > > April.
> > >
> > > Among the advantages of making this change are that
> > >
> > > * It would allow you to be selective, in that you could chose to be 
> > > notified
> > > about conventions but not standard names, or vice-versa, on GitHub. Of
> > > course, we recommending watching both of them!
> > >
> > > * We won't have to maintain a CF email list, which is an administrative
> > > complexity, especially as we currently have two different lists (for trac 
> > > and
> > > email), which have to be kept consistent manually. Anyone can join GitHub
> > > for themselves and watch the CF repositories.
> > >
> > > Best wishes and thanks for your interest in CF
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > >
> > > To get a username on GitHub, go to https://github.com/ and sign up. This 
> > > is
> > > free! Once you have a username, you can sign in.
> > >
> > > The issues on the CF conventions repository are at
> > >   https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues
> > > This shows the list of changes to 1.7 which are being discussed. (NB the 
> > > name
> > > of this repository will probably change, to improve consistency, and this 
> > > is not
> > > the repository for the standard name discussions, which we have not yet
> > > created.) If you wanted to start a new issue, which is like a new email 
> > > thread
> > > e.g. for a standard name proposal, you would click the "New issue" button,
> > > and get from there to a web form where you type plain text, and then
> > > "Submit" it.
> > >
> > > To comment on an issue (like replying to an email thread) you click on the
> > > issue, go the bottom of the page, write in the box, and press "Comment".
> > >
> > > To receive emails containing comments on any of the issues contributed by
> > > others, you can "watch" the repository, by clicking on the drop-down menu
> > > labelled "Watch" at the top of the page, with an icon like an eye. When 
> > > you
> > > receive such an email, you can reply to it and your reply will be posted 
> > > to the
> > > issue. (It tells you at the bottom of the email that you can do this, and 
> > > gives
> > > you the URL of the comment that's been sent in the the email in case you
> > > want to do it on GitHub.)
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CF-metadata mailing list
> > > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> > > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> >
> > Any email message from EUMETSAT is sent in good faith but shall neither be 
> > binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by EUMETSAT, except 
> > where provided for in a written agreement or contract or if explicitly 
> > stated in the email. Please note that any views or opinions presented in 
> > this email are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent 
> > those of EUMETSAT. This message and any attachments are intended for the 
> > sole use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
> > information. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, dissemination or 
> > distribution (in whole or in part) of its contents is not permitted. If you 
> > received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from 
> > your system.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CF-metadata mailing list
> > CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Dr. Richard P. Signell   (508) 457-2229
> USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd.
> Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to