Thanks Guys... for all your replies.. i will continue.. the load test and see what i can come up with.. It would have been great...if MM published some like "CF Coding Practices for CFMX" Vs "CF Coding Practices BEFORE CFMX". eg i saw a statment like <cfset x="hello"/> MM docs.. dont imply "/" anywhere.. so where "/" come from? it doesnt break the code.. so is this optimized CMFX?
If this is the case.... Developers will have a lot of work..getting code optimized for CFMX... Joe -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 4:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > To make my point clear...I think Basic operations in > CFMX show a degraded Performance under load...for > specific settings.. > I am trying to do the research.. you guys might be > right.. There might be some internal CFMX settings > that prove.. CFMX Scales better than... CF.50.. > Well..where are the MAGIC SETTINGS (MM docs.. dont > think so!).. Probably in the HEAD of some ENGINEER > MM LAIDOFF. I doubt that there are any "magic settings" anywhere. The fact is, CF MX is a completely different engine than CF 5, so the appropriate tuning settings for CF 5 are largely irrelevant. Even with CF 5, optimal tuning settings had to be determined by load testing your servers with their specific applications. You'll need to repeat this process with CF MX. I suspect that the settings you end up with may be completely different. For example, there's a "simultaneous requests" setting; to determine the optimal value for this, you really had to do load testing under CF 5 or any prior version. The same is true for CF MX now, however its unlikely to be the same value as it was for CF 5. You might want to approach this "from scratch" - don't follow any assumptions about what works well with CF 5. Load test your individual application to find the bottlenecks, and identify the operations that are taking longer (and causing those bottlenecks). Again, they might not be the same set of operations that caused bottlenecks in CF 5. See what changes you can make in those operations, and test to see what difference those changes can make. Then, once you're done load testing your application specifically, use the same load test path to determine optimal settings for CF server tuning switches. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
