On Sunday, July 28, 2002, at 09:06 , Joe Eugene wrote: > If you have personally done some convincing TESTS ... we would > be happy to know your TEST results.
While I ran CF5 and CFMX (pre-release) on the same Win2K system, my experience was that CFMX was faster (once the templates had been compiled on the first pass). CPU usage is higher with CFMX while it is compiling (obviously) but I'm not sure that the overall average CPU usage was higher with CFMX. As I said, I don't believe 100% CPU usage is a problem per se. > I am NOT asking you to comment on what "I" SAY/DO/TEST/CODE... rather > YOUR > TEST results... But I am very interested in the *code* of your tests - I want to know what the response times are with your code (something you haven't told us). > If you have none...why dont you tune yourself out of this THREAD. Perhaps if you were less unpleasant about this whole matter people would be more co-operative with you? I'm trying really hard to help you here but you haven't produced anything concrete for folks to work with. You've just been nasty and pointed fingers all around - while other people are quite clearly not having the same problems that you believe you are seeing. Stop raising your voice and show us the code and the response times. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
