I will admit that I think that our organization has codeing issues :) I am trying to show this and get past it, but the code analyzer blows up before it get very far. I run it and it churns for about 2 minutes maybe and then returns an error in one of its templates with a wddx error. I really want to try this tool out! Any suggestios ?????
Thanks, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 9:12 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? Joe you're not using the fusebox methodology by any chance are you? Personally I'd love to see Joe submit this code for the app so we can break it apart for him and show him why it's not scaling well. I think it's time for those people that have CFMX running take a stand and say, "Gee, well.. I've been running it for over 2 months and ... whew... does it fly." Every situation is unique I realize, but this is not rocket science here and no one will ever admit that the fault just might lie in their code. It's very easy to stand up and start swearing and place the blame and it's always time consuming to get to the root of the problem and swearing and placing the blame isn't going to get you there any faster... Has anyone on the list thought about creating a peer review mailing list? I realize that not everyone can sit and stare at code (we all have our own stuff to do), I myself would be curious about being reviewed by my peer to see if I'm on the right track. ~Todd At 09:53 AM 7/27/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Is the app large? Are you able to break the test down to just portions at a >time? Long shot but perhaps there's a particular operation taking place that >causes the memory spike. > >Stace > >-----Original Message----- >From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 2:55 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > >Alright guys.. i have tried almost what everybody generally knows >to CFMX perfomance.. >COM, Trusted Cache, Caching template size, Compile takes time etc... > >Is there anything else that has NOT been brought up? (MM Docs suck) >This is really pityfull... CFMX! might do some EXTRA stuff.. but if it cant >scale...atleast close to CF5.0... Why buy DAMN CFMX!!!! >Sorry on my language.. but this is really frustrating! >Joe > >-----Original Message----- >From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:41 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > >No we are not using any COM objects. > >Joe > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:38 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > >Joe Eugene wrote: > > None of the below have IMPROVED Performance. > > 1. Trusted Cache (Enabled) > > 2. Increased Template Cache Size (decrease Cache pops) > > 3. Decreased Consecutive Request to "5" > > 4. Restarted CF APP Service serveral times after setting changes. > > > > NONE of these have done any good so far. > >That's weird. > >Are you using COM objects? Those have had a severe slowdown in MX. > >If you are using COM, try replacing them with java or cfc's if possible. > >Otherwise generate stub's for them (that should speedup COM objects >quite a bit). > >Jesse Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.web-rat.com/ Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/ Moderator @ FlashCFM.com - http://www.flashCFM.com/ Back-end Moderator @ Ultrashock.com - http://www.ultrashock.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
