Can you give us some details? Is this performance equal in (CF 4.5, 5, and MX)? What software did you use for Load Testing? No of users? Machine? OS? Client Scope WDDX involved? Data store WDDX involved? Any performance results.. would be really appreciated.
Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > I have successfully been able to achieve great performance out of WDDX > intensive applications using CF 4.5, 5, and MX. > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > V: 415-577-8070 > F: 415-341-8906 > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:15 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > Stace, > > No..Not Client Scope. That would be a real big > problem..(client > > scope WDDX)... if all this > > turns out to be true....(WDDX Serialize - Deserialize) > performance > > in CFMX unless there > > is an optmized way(cfmx) to code WDDX. Yea.. WDDX in client > scope > > is > > great... > > The App am dealing with...WDDX is written to the database for > > Content MGMT, > > i didnt code this.. am not sure.. why the developer used this > > method..The data > > is even redundant. > > Have you had a chance to LOAD TEST any Client Scope WDDX in > > CFMX..? > > Curious? > > Joe > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:10 PM > > Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > > > > Hey Joe I'm curious...these objects...are they wddx packets stored > in > > client > > > scope which in turn is in your client variable datasource? > > > > > > Stace > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:54 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > > > Sean, > > > I havent come to a final test result.. but i think we are > > narrowing > > > it > > > down to the Complex Object(WDDX) returned from the data > store > > > that gets parsed out WDDX2CFML.. > > > Custom Tags are probably running ok/fast.. probably its the > WDDX > > > parsing..in CFMX that causes the CPU to run 80-90%... > Atleast we > > > are seeing a pattern here with tests. > > > I will try to write case/result...end of this week or so. > > > Is it possible that you can find out.. > > > How the Java Implementation of WDDX2CFML has changed in > CFMX? > > > Any WDDX implementation changes(Not in docs) will be > helpful. > > > Thanks > > > Joe > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:00 AM > > > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 07:26 , Joe Eugene wrote: > > > > > Do you know of any internal WDDX implementation > differences > > > > > between > > > > > CFMX and CF5.0 .. CFMX > > > > > > > > Er, yes, it was written in C/C++ in CF5 and it's been rewritten in > > Java > > in > > > > CFMX. As has everything else. Read my lips Joe: CFMX is a complete > > > rewrite. > > > > > > > > > What does #1 mean? > > > > > > > > I don't know. I don't use JavaScript with queries so I don't know > what > > the > > > > behavior was or how it changed. > > > > > > > > > If WDDX data is Stored in a DB and output using custom > > tags.. > > is > > > > > there any internal CFMX > > > > > implementation that would degrade performance compared > to > > CF5.0? > > > > > > > > Well, custom tag invocations are faster in CFMX than in CF5. I > have no > > > > idea about WDDX. Do you *think* it is slower? Have you written a > test > > case > > > > and *proved* there is a noticeable difference? Why don't you try > it > > for > > > > yourself. > > > > > > > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > > > > > > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > > > > -- Margaret Atwood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
