It can be replicated in a cluster? Is this an enterprise feature? How is this accomplished? When you mentioned the session state method, it sounded like a good idea, especially if it is faster than the cached query method. But I didn't know you could share the data amongst a cluster.
Although, I guess query caching isn't shared across servers, but you don't need to write anything special to handle this because the query would just be refreshed if the user was bounced to another server during the same session. Thanks Stace, working on a long weekend? Brook At 06:06 PM 03/08/02 -0400, you wrote: >I was paranoid in using session scope in previous versions...especially with >large amounts of data...plus in CFMX the session data can be replicated in a >cluster. > >Cheers, > >Stace > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 6:08 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: browsing large recordsets - cursors? > >What is the difference with CFMX that allows you to kill the session scope? >Wasn't this possible in earlier versions? > >Brook > >At 05:45 PM 03/08/02 -0400, you wrote: > >I've got a heavy reporting app which used query caching on large recordsets > >(10K-20K rows at times) with no isssues... > > > >Now that I'm on CFMX I've moved the data in session scope so I can kill it > >as soon as it's not needed....appears to be a good deal more efficient... > > > >Stace > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 5:00 PM > >To: CF-Talk > >Subject: browsing large recordsets - cursors? > > > >Hello y'all, > > > >In an application which allows forward / backwards browsing of large > >recordsets (10,000-25,000) and access to individual records details, how is > >this best handled with CF? > > > >I am currently caching the query and then displaying the rows within each > >screen. But this means that the large recordset is held in memory, and this > >seems a bit inefficient. Is there a better way to browse records like this? > >I've heard MSSQL Cursors might be a solution to this problem. Does anyone > >know of CF/CURSOR resources? Is this a good/bad idea? > > > >Thanks for your input. > > > >-Brook > >Brook Davies > >President > >maracasmedia inc > >www.maracasmedia.com > >logiforms / logiworks software inc. > >www.logiforms.com > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
