Tormod Guldvog wrote: > > Here's what they say (quote from their reply to my post in their forums): > > "If you are worried about uptime, you should not be on a Cold Fusion MX server. We >keep > emailing this to our customers, putting it in newsletters etc. but people are not > understanding that this is a complete rewrite of the Macromedia Cold Fusion product, >and > there are many pieces that don't work properly at this time. It is somewhat >compatible, > and many features do work, but there are load issues and connectivity issues to >ODBC. The > biggest problem is their ODBC service which they had to create in order to connect >from > JRUN/JDBC to Windows native ODBC. The ODBC services stall just as they did in Cold >Fusion > 4.5 before service packs.
I would think that is exactly why MM writes in the docs JDBC Type 1 and 2 Drivers are not recommended. If the host sets up MX but does not follow this recommendation all bets are off. Jochem ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
