> Matt wrote: > > > I tend to trust that the programmer who wrote arraySort() already > > used the most efficient algorithm available. If it's not the most > > efficient, it still be may efficient enough for my needs. If it's > > not efficient enough for my needs and it's a UDF, I'll change the > > code in the UDF so that the next person to use the UDF (possibly > > myself) won't have to go through all that trouble again. > > > The problem is there is no one most efficient algorithm. It is > completely dependent on your data set as I indicated in another mail. > Yeah, good point. But as I indicated in the same mail, what really matters to me isn't whether it's the /most/ efficient, but whether it's efficient enough. ;-)
Patrick ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
