Mark,
The <cfincludes are pointers to other files and would equate to 1 line (or
there about - as opposed to bringing all the cfcode to the calling page)
So, in other words, if there are over ~850 cf lines in a single file you
will run into problems (850 is very loose as it depends on what you are
doing)
Devin,
html does count. this is not documented by MM to my knowledge. It is a Java
limitation.
** only fix **
break up the files and include the pieces into a new file
ie
index.cfm includes index0.cfm < ~800lines index1.cfm < ~800lines etc
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
Rob,
Can you elaborate on the "large file" issue? For example, if I have the
following:
<cfinclude template="EventHandler.cfm">
... other includes depending on the event ....
<cfinclude template="header.cfm">
<cfinclude template="upperdisplay.cfm">
<cfinclude template="lowerdisplay.cfm">
<Cfinclude template="Footer.cfm">
.... and assuming that each of these scripts is a couple hundred lines or
so - is that a CFMX killer, or is that ok? I realize that using CFC's
eliminate the necessity of problems like this and we are actively do that
for projects "going forward" - but what about complex aps written for CF 4.x
or 5?
-mk
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
Hi Mark,
We have a very large site, and have had a few problems.
Here are some other thing you need to watch for / problems we had/have:
1. MX can not handle large .cfm files. By large I mean > ~850 lines of code
2. You could have some issues if you use fusebox methodology.
3. Jacked up database connections - I believe these are due to the fact
that MS doesn't have a SQL *7* JDBC Driver. Since you are using SQL2000 they
have native JDBC drivers so you *might* not have issues.
4. Sloppy code
5. XSL transformations can not have variables passed into them
On the plus side:
MX does XML building really, really cool and in a groovy way
Once complied the "feel" of MX is quite snappy.
Debugging is rad - especially if you know Java
CFC are cool
in cfscript you can use normal tags!
Cheers,
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Problems with CFMX?
I have been watching threads like "LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF" and "CFMX - I've never seen anything so unstable in my life" over
the past few weeks. What has me concerned is this next few weeks I am going
to upgrade a fairly large site to CFMX. The site currently runs CF 5 and MS
SQL 2000. Are there a large number of problems with CFMX that I should know
about? Luckily I have a few weeks to play with the new servers before they
go live.
Any ETA on a CFMX .1 update? (is one needed)
Thanks
Mark W. Breneman
-Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
-Network / Web Server Administrator
Vivid Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vividmedia.com
608.270.9770
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
