You know, to make Basic coders happy, how about: <CFGOTO LABEL="">
And to make us C/C++ coders happy, pre-processor directives: <CFDEFINE> <CFIFDEF> <CFIFNDEF> </CFIFNDEF> And finally, just in case we get the urge to tinker in ASM, an int call would be useful: <CFINT INTERRUPT="" ASM=""> Oh, this could get mighty ugly. Which has to raise the logical question - at what point does stuff no longer belong in CFML and start belonging in Beans, Servlets, CFX tags, etc? Hummmmm. -----Original Message----- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:14 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFML standardization (was RE: BlueDragon (was RE: How is CFMX J2EE implemented?)) On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 18:00 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote: > I should probably stay out of this--- oh, what the hell. Now look what you've started! :) > BTW, Vince, I'd like typing of variables and Nulls in CFML :) Hey Vince, ya wanna see my feature wishlist? It's *really* long!! In no particular order (but these haven't been mentioned lately): 1. cffinally 2. throw in cfscript 3. access="protected" 4. interfaces / abstract components 5. named constructors 6. the ability to throw typed objects (like Java and C++) 7. ... (it goes on for pages and, yes, it includes typed declarations, NULL, parallel processing constructs) *thinks* I wonder what ColdFusion would look like with C++-style templates or the forthcoming Java parameterized types? "I can smell your brains!" -- Mittens the Kitten : http://www.matazone.co.uk/theotherside.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
