> > BTW, Vince, I'd like typing of variables and Nulls in CFML :) Good Point! I think variable types and some OOP constructs should be available in CFML as an Option...just like cflocks.. if you dont want it.. dont use it.
Sean... there are alot of instances.. where we need strongly typed language or code... we have proven this before... Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:14 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFML standardization (was RE: BlueDragon (was RE: How is > CFMX J2EE implemented?)) > > > On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 18:00 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote: > > I should probably stay out of this--- oh, what the hell. > > Now look what you've started! :) > > > Hey Vince, ya wanna see my feature wishlist? It's *really* long!! > > In no particular order (but these haven't been mentioned lately): > 1. cffinally > 2. throw in cfscript > 3. access="protected" > 4. interfaces / abstract components > 5. named constructors > 6. the ability to throw typed objects (like Java and C++) > 7. ... > (it goes on for pages and, yes, it includes typed declarations, NULL, > parallel processing constructs) > > *thinks* I wonder what ColdFusion would look like with C++-style > templates or the forthcoming Java parameterized types? > > "I can smell your brains!" > -- Mittens the Kitten : http://www.matazone.co.uk/theotherside.html > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
