Yeah, and the latest and greatest apache is 2.0.43 ... and, until Macromedia figures out what to do to resolve the magic number that continues to keep changing, nothing can be done about that. Vern mentioned that they are working on it (for the next updater?)
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dave Watts wrote: > > Isn't Apache 2 still considered beta? > > No, Apache 2 is gold, and is the recommended platform according to the > Apache Group. This is especially true if you're running Apache on Windows - > Apache 1.3.x was always considered beta quality on Windows by the Apache > Group. > > > If it's not considered beta anymore, then why is > > Apache 1.3.x still being maintained? I've seen MORE > > security issues with 2.0 lately than I have with 1.3.x > > (and, I would have to say that 1.3.x is the mature > > software here). > > There are a lot of people sticking with Apache 1.3.x, as far as I can tell. > There have been a lot of significant changes in the module architecture in > Apache 2, and you can't get all the modules that are available on Apache > 1.3.x. Also, to add to that, there have been significant changes between > Apache 2 point releases, which is why CFMX doesn't work with 2.0.42, for > example. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
