> What's the advantage of running through a webserver such > as Apache versus the web server that's built in to JRun? > Mind you, I'm talking about *CFMX FOR JRUN*, not CFMX > standalone. I know about the standalone performance > differences, but do these same differences exist for > JRun?
As far as I can tell, there's no difference between the web server used by CFMX for JRun and that used by the "standalone" CFMX Enterprise or Professional. So, yes, I imagine that the same differences exist, whatever they are. Macromedia simply states that you shouldn't use it for production use, and I've never tried to. > For a relatively low-traffic, internally used site, does > it matter if I go into the jrun.xml file and change the > port fro 8100 to 80 and just go with that? Probably not. However, if you're using any of the extra functionality that your web server might provide, obviously you won't get that with the JRun web server. For example, server authentication - that's something I rely on quite a bit. Personally, I'd rather use IIS or Apache anyway just because I feel they're easier to manage. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
