Hi > I think the reason that people make so many variations > of Fusebox is because they are constantly finding limitations.
You could also say people are finding ways to improve the methodology (framework), which, is a good thing in some cases. > As you stated, there could be so many variations of it, and > when troubleshooting one of those variations, it still takes > the same amount of time to figure out the modified "framework" > as it would any other "framework". FuseQ, one of the more popular Fusebox hybrids, just adds functionality to Fusebox. You can use the FuseQ core files with any Fusebox 3 application without fear of something breaking and without getting lost in the code--you simply use as much or as little of the added functionality as you would like. Best regards, MW ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
