On Monday, Feb 24, 2003, at 17:51 US/Pacific, Barney Boisvert wrote: > "I think that a version of Fusebox that uses CFCs as the base > component is a > long ways off as in months. There are just too many problems with CFCs > for > me to suggest that people rely heavily on them, which we would be > doing with > Fusebox MX." > > I have to agree with Hal's position on the matter. As cool as CFCs > could > be, they are still too problematic to depend heavily on.
Well, I'm going to disagree. I don't understand why Hal is having such problems - I've offered to help him but he hasn't taken me up on the offers. CFCs work just fine and can be used to build high-performance, scalable systems. I think it's very unfair of Hal to claim there are "just too many problems with CFCs" without providing more specific details. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
