Really Funny LOL.. When was the last time.. you read a Java Book on JDBC...? Every Java book..probably talks about advantages and disadvantages..of JDBC/ODBC Drives.. This is nothing new in CFMX Product Manuals..
I guess when you develop an application.. and you user complains something is wrong.. you probably tell him... "Oh.. I really didnt mean that to work!. That was left over code from BETA.."Have you read the manuals?.." I really did mention it in the manuals!." Do you want me to send someone to read the manuals to you? We really do have some passionate CF Developers...LOL :) Joe -------Original Message------- From: Andrew Tyrone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 03/07/03 02:56 PM To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: The New Macromedia Website(ODBC) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:26 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: The New Macromedia Website(ODBC) > > > Dave.. > >I know plenty of people running CFMX production servers right > >now. They might disagree with your conclusion about releasing > >too soon. Maybe if you want to use ODBC to talk to your AS400 > >DB2, but >that's a pretty small segment of users I suspect. > > I have been able to come up with an alternative (Java) solution > to every problem i have come across in CFMX..(*SO FAR*) and i > dont have a problem implementing them... > So i really DONT have to Bi**ch about something NOT working in CFMX... > Am just bringing up issues here...FOR the General GOOD OF CFMX!. > IF the Community/MM thinks a CFMX BUG is trivial, i can play > along with that. > > Joe Eugene The problem that I see is that a lot of people who do nothing but complain about a *supposed* CFMX bug waste a lot of time because they refuse to call tech support. It's always struck me that these same people would call tech support in a minute if they were sure it was a CFMX bug. I recall one of these people complaining about ODBC and how the disclaimer about it not being recommended was nowhere to be found. It was, however, in the documentation. Of course, people don't have time to read the documentation, but they have time to write 500 messages to cf-talk to say how crappy MM tech support is and that they shouldn't have to pay for support because they've found a bug in CFMX. I have a good idea: I think MM should have Christian Cantrell shipped via UPS with every CFMX purchase so he can read the documentation to everyone who feels he should know every installation caveat without ever reading anything about the product. He could also come with a roll of toilet paper. --Andy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
