Ok Sean, on the performance I read that somewhere but cannot recall where,
when I do I will point it out.  With regard to coding bad practice I have no
doubts that multiple layers of nested includes-custom tags are bad practice
as they make code very hard to read and follow.  Our opinion here at
Webapper is that all who see our code should be able to fully understand
what we did, how and why and even with the best of commenting multi-level
nested includes are very hard to follow.

Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Webapper Services LLC
Web Site http://www.webapper.com
Blog http://www.webapper.net

Webapper <Web Application Specialists>

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFINCLUDES and RE: CFC Performance Best Practice

On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 09:30 US/Pacific, Mike Brunt wrote:
> Am I right in my assumption that nested CFINCLUDES/CUSTOM TAGS cause
> performance issues in CFMX?  I am fully aware that they are bad coding
> practice but just wanted to clarify this point.

News to me... both that they supposedly cause performance issues and
that they are bad coding practice... could you clarify for me?

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to