Hi Dave, yes, i mean split one datasource with 100 tables in two datasources with 50 tables each.
Thank you. Leonardo. Date: 07/07/2003 01:40 PM Author: Dave Sueltenfuss Short Link: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=m:4:25313:127344 Leonardo, Do you mean spilt the database itself up or just have two datasources pointing to the same database? There should be no performance issue based on the number of tables within a database, unless you are trying to call data from all at once(then again, that really wouldn't work unless you built it that way to begin with, and that alone would cause lots of problems). Dave ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
