> idea but overblown for most web apps. We are now back to CF and using a > methodology from www.benorama.com It's nice, supports internationalisation
Ben has some really good ideas, a few things i wasnt a big fan of. 1. <cfLocation ...> in controllers.. which are *.cfc's <cflocation url="#application.virtualPaths.APPROOT#" addtoken="no"> HTTP redirection for application flow seems like "Go To's" to me. 2. CFC Calls within view pages. I Personally think controller should handle all data calls and this shouldnt be within any View pages.. The Only Job of a View is to Display Information/Data. Joe Eugene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jordan Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:38 AM Subject: RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > Hi, > > We were using struts as a development methodology/framework. Really cool > idea but overblown for most web apps. We are now back to CF and using a > methodology from www.benorama.com It's nice, supports internationalisation, > MVC, n-tier and it's a lot simpler than Struts which means that it's quick > to develop with. True, it doesn't have the validator but we found that to be > a little rigid "straight out of the box". The workflow stuff was a little > lame too. CF is far nicer to work with. > > my 2 cents anyway > > Jordan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Smith, Don , CTR , WHS/PSD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 14 July 2003 9:50 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > Is anyone using Jakarta Struts for CFMX and can they comment toward its use? > > I am looking for a published development framework that would be flexible > enough for development in, plus allow our team to investigate new > technologies outside of CFMX -I like what I read of Struts' integration of > Java technology but I haven't implemented it yet. > > I'm working with some staff for whom integration of existing Java libraries > would be a stretch and others who could handle it easily, but it would > require ramp-up time and > education. > > I am hoping to find a framework that would allow me to point new developers > to existing materials so I would not have to write up an entire "code like I > do" book. I am also hoping that it would add something on top of CFMX and > not merely reorganize CFMX without adding anything. > > How was your: > Ease of development and organization > Integration with Java for non-Java programmers > Success rate in getting users to adapt > > THANKS! > > Don > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
