> Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). See > http://www.mach-ii.com/ >
Most good developers tend towards the same small set of generalized solutions to a given problem -- algorithms for math, design patterns for OO, etc. Doesn't surprise me at all :) Not to mention that since Struts is out there, folks can dissect it and get rid of some of the annoying parts. Now we just need a ColdFusion framework that derives from Tapestry... Regards, John Paul Ashenfelter CTO/TransitionPoint > On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > > > I have used alot of Concepts from Jakarta Structs as MVC for recent > > application. > > It worked very well, with a very high level of code management. > > Begining > > with > > file structure > > > > index.cfm is the only exposed page of the applicaiton. > > application.xml for application level control/instantiation > > > > system/model/data -- contains data objects > > system/model/logic -- logic controls > > system/model/validator -- validation controls for forms etc > > > > system/controller -- controller files > > system/view -- all view sub-components or pages. > > > > controller.xml for flow control and method execution mappings.. > > similar to > > whats > > done in Jakarta Struts except ...*.cfc used here. All method mappings > > are > > executed > > dynamically and variables in the xml mapping get the result or set > > values in > > variables scope. View Components do NOT touch high level scope > > variables > > like > > client/session/application. > > > > I have been quite happy with the Model.. Once the model is written.. > > all you > > do is > > write your data layer methods and view pages.. and you are done.. The > > controller does > > the rest of the job. > > > >> Ease of development and organization > > Heavy resistance from other CF Developers at first.. but then some > > started > > to realize > > the benefits... Others are hung on the Fusebox 3 Case Style. > > > > If you are really excited about developing some class applications and > > tight > > coding... it becomes very hard > > to work with developers who arent looking to improve.. but just get the > > project done... > > > > Joe Eugene > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Smith, Don , CTR , WHS/PSD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:50 PM > > Subject: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx? > > > > > >> Is anyone using Jakarta Struts for CFMX and can they comment toward > >> its > > use? > >> > >> I am looking for a published development framework that would be > >> flexible > >> enough for development in, plus allow our team to investigate new > >> technologies outside of CFMX -I like what I read of Struts' > >> integration of > >> Java technology but I haven't implemented it yet. > >> > >> I'm working with some staff for whom integration of existing Java > > libraries > >> would be a stretch and others who could handle it easily, but it would > >> require ramp-up time and > >> education. > >> > >> I am hoping to find a framework that would allow me to point new > > developers > >> to existing materials so I would not have to write up an entire "code > >> like > > I > >> do" book. I am also hoping that it would add something on top of > >> CFMX and > >> not merely reorganize CFMX without adding anything. > >> > >> How was your: > >> Ease of development and organization > >> Integration with Java for non-Java programmers > >> Success rate in getting users to adapt > >> > >> THANKS! > >> > >> Don > >> > >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
